Phillip Büchler

In the last post I took apart a silly internet question: could 100 unarmed men beat one gorilla? Most serious answers agreed the men win eventually, if they accept heavy losses. One sub-question stayed with me. Who goes first? The man who started the debate gave the most honest answer. He would join the 100, just not the first wave. Most of us would say the same. So the first wave is made of volunteers, and probably the bravest ones. Here is the paradox. It takes brave people to go first. It also takes brave people to keep going after watching the first wave go down. If the bravest all go first, who is left for the rest of the fight?

I was walking my dog the other day and asked myself how I would explain critical thinking to students. Not the textbook version. The version where you take a question apart and find out it was never one question. My dog had no opinion on the matter. The example I landed on is a bit embarrassing: 100 men against a gorilla. If you missed it, the question started as a Reddit thread in 2020 and went properly viral in late April 2025. Could 100 unarmed men beat one silverback? TikTok argued, zoo directors gave interviews, and at least one US senator shared his view on the record.1

I just went through the slides of an old Gartner keynote about the digital workplace. “Old” is a big word here, since it is from 2024, but in technology terms that is already close to retirement age. I did not attend the talk, and the slides are graphically simple. So this is my interpretation of the slides, not a summary of what was said on stage. One slide stood out. It lists what leaders should take away: see the danger of only dealing with the problems in front of you, and support the ambitions for AI and distributed work. Other slides talk about everyday AI, productivity gains and new ways of working.

Upload your CV. Now type your name, address, employment history, education and qualifications into the text boxes below. The company already has that information, but its recruitment system can’t reliably map your document onto the structure its process requires. So the applicant becomes the integration layer. You read your own CV, reconcile terminology, reformat dates and fit your experience into categories the vendor chose. The form was digitised, not removed. Most enterprise AI adoption stalls at the same point.

Picture two versions of the same person. In the first, hands on the rung above, one foot pushing off the rung below, golden light spilling down from somewhere unseen and clearly worth reaching. In the second, the camera has pulled back far enough to show the ladder was bent into a wheel a while ago. Same grip. Same posture. Nothing about the motion changed — only that “up” quietly stopped meaning anything, and the light turned out to be an ordinary bulb hung just out of reach, doing exactly what it was installed to do: keep the climbing going.